At a Glance: Key Differences
Data-driven observations based on disclosed figures. Not investment advice — verify current numbers in each franchise's FDD.
⚠️ Risk Assessment
Risk signals from FDD disclosures. Higher score = lower risk. Verify all figures in each franchise's current FDD before investing.
| Risk Factor | Home Instead | Visiting Angels |
|---|---|---|
| Failure Rate | 2% | 2.5% |
| Unit Turnover (Growth) | +1%/yr | +1.5%/yr |
| Total Fee Burden | 6.0% | 3.5% |
| Territory Protection | ✅ Exclusive | ✅ Exclusive |
Detailed Analysis: Home Instead vs Visiting Angels
According to FranchiseStack.ai's franchise database of 192+ FDD-sourced opportunities, Home Instead and Visiting Angels are among the most-researched franchise comparisons. The choice comes down to your investment capacity, risk tolerance, and operational preferences. Both operate in the Senior Care sector, which means they compete for similar customers and territory. Home Instead has a larger footprint, which typically translates to stronger brand recognition but potentially more territorial saturation.
From a capital perspective, Visiting Angels has a lower entry point. However, initial investment alone doesn't determine ROI — ongoing royalties, revenue potential, and failure rates all factor into long-term returns. Visiting Angels charges a lower royalty rate, which means more of your gross revenue stays in your pocket.
Franchisee satisfaction is one of the strongest predictors of long-term success. Home Instead leads with a 81/100 satisfaction score, indicating that existing owners are more positive about their decision. Before committing to either franchise, we recommend running both through our Financial Model tool to project personalized 5-year P&L scenarios. You should also review each franchise's complete Franchise Disclosure Document using our FDD Checker to understand litigation history, termination rates, and territory restrictions.
Investment & Fees
| Metric | Home Instead | Visiting Angels |
|---|---|---|
| Min Investment | $98K | $84K |
| Max Investment | $125K | $132K |
| Franchise Fee | $45K | $50K |
| Royalty Rate | 5.0% | 3.5% |
| Ad Fund Rate | 1.0% | 0.0% |
Unit Economics
| Metric | Home Instead | Visiting Angels |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Unit Revenue | $2.6M | $1.2M |
| Avg Profit Margin | N/A | N/A |
Scale & Growth
| Metric | Home Instead | Visiting Angels |
|---|---|---|
| Total Units | 1,225 | 700 |
| Annual Growth | 1.0% | 1.5% |
| Failure Rate | 2.0% | 2.5% |
Franchisee Performance
| Metric | Home Instead | Visiting Angels |
|---|---|---|
| Franchisee Satisfaction | 81/100 | 78/100 |
Track Record
| Metric | Home Instead | Visiting Angels |
|---|---|---|
| Years in Business | 32 | 28 |
| Years Franchising | 32 | 26 |
Financial Requirements
| Metric | Home Instead | Visiting Angels |
|---|---|---|
| Min Net Worth Required | $250K | $150K |
| Liquid Capital Required | $100K | $75K |
Operations
| Metric | Home Instead | Visiting Angels |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Employees | 50 | 40 |
| Training Weeks | 3 | 2 |
⚠️ Risk Indicators
| Metric | Home Instead | Visiting Angels |
|---|---|---|
| Failure Rate | 2.0% | 2.5% |
| Annual Unit Growth | 1.0% | 1.5% |
| Units Opened Last Year | 30 | 25 |
| Units Closed Last Year | N/A | N/A |
| Exclusive Territory | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
📄 Downloadable Report
Get This Comparison as PDF — $19
Investment breakdown · Payback timeline · Royalty drag analysis · 5-year projected return · Red flags. Delivered instantly to your email.
Franchise consultants charge $500–$1,000 for a comparison analysis like this. $19 — no account required.
🔒 Secure Stripe checkout
Instant email delivery · No account needed
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Home Instead or Visiting Angels a better franchise investment?
The answer depends on your goals, budget, and market. Home Instead has 1,225 total units and a 81/100 franchisee satisfaction score. Visiting Angels has 700 total units and a 78/100 franchisee satisfaction score. Use our ROI Calculator to model both scenarios.
How much does it cost to open a Home Instead franchise?
Based on data in our database, opening a Home Instead franchise requires an initial investment of $98K – $125K. The franchise fee is $45K, with ongoing royalties of 5.0%. Always request the current FDD for exact figures.
How much does it cost to open a Visiting Angels franchise?
Based on data in our database, opening a Visiting Angels franchise requires an initial investment of $84K – $132K. The franchise fee is $50K, with ongoing royalties of 3.5%. Always request the current FDD for exact figures.
What is the royalty rate for Home Instead vs Visiting Angels?
Home Instead's royalty rate is 5.0%. Visiting Angels's royalty rate is 3.5%. That means Visiting Angels has the lower ongoing royalty burden.
Which has more locations — Home Instead or Visiting Angels?
Home Instead has 1,225 total units. Visiting Angels has 700 total units. A larger system can mean more brand recognition, but also more territorial competition.
Is Home Instead or Visiting Angels semi-absentee friendly?
Home Instead is typically run as a owner-operator model. Visiting Angels is typically run as a owner-operator model. If passive income is your goal, semi-absentee models let you hire a manager to run day-to-day operations.
Related Comparisons
Data sourced from franchise disclosure documents and public records. Investment ranges, royalty rates, and unit counts change — always request current FDD before making investment decisions. Last updated March 2026.
📄 Instant PDF Report
Get Full Analysis as PDF
Investment breakdown, payback timeline, royalty drag, 5-year return & red flags — sent to your email.
Franchise consultants charge $500–$1,000+ for a comparison like this. Get yours for $19.
Get PDF — $19 →🔒 Secure Stripe · No account needed · Instant email delivery
Get Personalized AI Matching
See which franchise fits your budget, lifestyle, and goals — not just which has better raw numbers.
Start Free →Compare Up to 4 Franchises
Our full comparison tool adds personalized fit scores, FDD insights, and territory availability.
Open Comparison Tool